lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <368f7507-cfb9-b64a-d3e4-558307c5e078@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:04:40 -0500
From:   Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, vkoul@...nel.org,
        broonie@...nel.org, Gyeongtaek Lee <gt82.lee@...sung.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 05/13] ASoC: soc-pcm: align BE 'atomicity' with
 that of the FE



On 10/15/21 6:22 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> If this patch causes issues outside of the trigger phase, then maybe we
> could just change the BE nonatomic flag temporarily and restore it after
> taking the lock, but IMHO something else is broken in other drivers.

Now that I think of it, this wouldn't work, the type of locks for the
BEs has to be set before the trigger: the DPCM flow is that we start
from the FEs and find which BEs need to be triggered. That would prevent
us from modifying a global BE property - each FE is independent.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ