[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211015120559.3515645-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 14:05:59 +0200
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: sboyd@...nel.org
Cc: heiko@...ech.de, knaerzche@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com
Subject: [PATCH] clk: composite: Also consider .determine_rate for rate + mux composites
Commit 69a00fb3d69706 ("clk: divider: Implement and wire up
.determine_rate by default") switches clk_divider_ops to implement
.determine_rate by default. This breaks composite clocks with multiple
parents because clk-composite.c does not use the special handling for
mux + divider combinations anymore (that was restricted to rate clocks
which only implement .round_rate, but not .determine_rate).
Alex reports:
This breaks lot of clocks for Rockchip which intensively uses
composites, i.e. those clocks will always stay at the initial parent,
which in some cases is the XTAL clock and I strongly guess it is the
same for other platforms, which use composite clocks having more than
one parent (e.g. mediatek, ti ...)
Example (RK3399)
clk_sdio is set (initialized) with XTAL (24 MHz) as parent in u-boot.
It will always stay at this parent, even if the mmc driver sets a rate
of 200 MHz (fails, as the nature of things), which should switch it
to any of its possible parent PLLs defined in
mux_pll_src_cpll_gpll_npll_ppll_upll_24m_p (see clk-rk3399.c) - which
never happens.
Restore the original behavior by changing the priority of the conditions
inside clk-composite.c. Now the special rate + mux case (with rate_ops
having a .round_rate - which is still the case for the default
clk_divider_ops) is preferred over rate_ops which have .determine_rate
defined (and not further considering the mux).
Fixes: 69a00fb3d69706 ("clk: divider: Implement and wire up .determine_rate by default")
Reported-by: Alex Bee <knaerzche@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
---
Re-sending this as inline patch instead of attaching it.
drivers/clk/clk-composite.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c b/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
index 0506046a5f4b..510a9965633b 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
@@ -58,11 +58,8 @@ static int clk_composite_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
long rate;
int i;
- if (rate_hw && rate_ops && rate_ops->determine_rate) {
- __clk_hw_set_clk(rate_hw, hw);
- return rate_ops->determine_rate(rate_hw, req);
- } else if (rate_hw && rate_ops && rate_ops->round_rate &&
- mux_hw && mux_ops && mux_ops->set_parent) {
+ if (rate_hw && rate_ops && rate_ops->round_rate &&
+ mux_hw && mux_ops && mux_ops->set_parent) {
req->best_parent_hw = NULL;
if (clk_hw_get_flags(hw) & CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT) {
@@ -107,6 +104,9 @@ static int clk_composite_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
req->rate = best_rate;
return 0;
+ } else if (rate_hw && rate_ops && rate_ops->determine_rate) {
+ __clk_hw_set_clk(rate_hw, hw);
+ return rate_ops->determine_rate(rate_hw, req);
} else if (mux_hw && mux_ops && mux_ops->determine_rate) {
__clk_hw_set_clk(mux_hw, hw);
return mux_ops->determine_rate(mux_hw, req);
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists