lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 13:45:18 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: mfd: sprd: Add bindings for ums512
 global registers

On Thu, 14 Oct 2021, Rob Herring wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:48 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Oct 2021, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Lee,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 10:15 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2021, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 3:00 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Add bindings for Unisoc system global register which provide register map
> > > > > > > for clocks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >  .../bindings/mfd/sprd,ums512-glbreg.yaml      | 68 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > >  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
> > > > > > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/sprd,ums512-glbreg.yaml
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Unapplied v3 and applied this (v4) instead, thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > What about the clock binding this depends on:
> > > > >
> > > > > Unknown file referenced: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
> > > > > '/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/dtschema/schemas/clock/sprd,ums512-clk.yaml'
> > > > > xargs: dt-doc-validate: exited with status 255; aborting
> > > > > make[1]: *** Deleting file
> > > > > 'Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/sprd,ums512-glbreg.example.dt.yaml'
> > > > > Unknown file referenced: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
> > > > > '/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/dtschema/schemas/clock/sprd,ums512-clk.yaml'
> > > > > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:385:
> > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/sprd,ums512-glbreg.example.dt.yaml]
> > > > > Error 255
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Once again, all the components of MFD bindings need to be applied together.
> > >
> > > Just ran into this, too...
> > >
> > > > I can't apply what is not sent to me.
> > > >
> > > > This patch came in on its own.
> > >
> > > Then please reject/postpone patches that don't build (yet) ;-)
> >
> > I don't explicitly build DT documentation.
> >
> > Since I use the build bots to let me know if there are strange !(C,
> > ASM, arm, aarch64, mips, ppc, x86) build issues or ones with odd
> > configuration possibilities (randconfig) in the repos I maintain, you
> > might have to convince them that this is important too.
> 
> It's really just a matter of turning on the build in
> allyesconfig/allmodconfig builds. I've not done that primarily because
> there's one person I don't want to yell at me, but I could probably
> make it arm and/or arm64 only. It's really arch and config
> independent, so doing it multiple times is kind of pointless.
> 
> I assume for bots you mean kernel-ci mainly? Do you run that before
> stuff gets into linux-next? IMO, that's too late. But still a slight
> improvement if things go in via one tree. Otherwise, I see the
> breakage twice, 1st linux-next then the merge window.

Kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> is the one that springs to mind.

Although, I'm sure there are other, less prolific implementations.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists