lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d3c97cd-d243-6a2c-9964-4d1d22691db0@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:30:06 +0800
From:   Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuwamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        x86@...nel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/6] x86/split_lock: Fix the split lock #AC handling
 when running as guest

On 10/14/2021 11:04 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>> On 10/14/2021 5:32 AM, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
>>> + Xiaoyao
>>>
>>> On 10/13/21 1:30 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>>>>> From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> If running as guest and hypervisor enables
>>>>> MSR_TEST_CTRL.SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT during its running, it can get split
>>>>> lock #AC even though sld_state is sld_off.
>>>> That's a hypervisor bug, no?  The hypervisor should never inject a fault
>>>> that the guest cannot reasonably expect.
>>
>> What if hypervisor doesn't intercept #AC and host enables SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT
>> during guest running? That's exactly the case TDX is facing.
> 
> That's a hypervisor bug.  Since it sounds like the TDX Module buries its head in
> the sand for split-lock #AC, KVM should refuse to run TDX guests if split-lock #AC
> is enabled.  Ideally the TDX Module would provide support for conditionally
> intercepting #AC, e.g. intercept and re-inject "normal" #AC, and exit to the VMM
> for split-lock #AC.  That would give VMMs the option of enabling split-lock
> detection in fatal mode for guests.
> 

We have bus lock VM exit for it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ