lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 16 Oct 2021 15:11:39 -0500
From:   Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Adam Ford-BE <aford@...conembedded.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] dt-bindings: soc: imx: Add binding doc for spba bus

On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 4:19 PM Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:02 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:04:14 -0600, Adam Ford wrote:
> > > Add binding doc for fsl,spba-bus.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > make dt_binding_check -j8 |grep spba
> > >   DTEX    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/fsl,spba-bus.example.dts
> > >   DTC     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/fsl,spba-bus.example.dt.yaml
> > >   CHECK   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/fsl,spba-bus.example.dt.yaml
> > >
> > > V5:  Rebase on 5.10-rc2 to be able to check yaml
> > >      Add Reg entry
> > >
> > > V4:  Remove an accidental makefile change
> > >      Move type:object under additional properties
> > >
> > > V3:  Rebase sample from aips-bus example
> > >      Split off from series adding i.MX8M Nano functions to reduce noise
> > >
> > > V2:  Attempted to update yaml from feedback
> > >
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
>
> Rob,
>
> I am not seeing this anywhere.  Can you tell me where this was
> applied?  It's not appearing in Linux-next

Rob,

Patchwork shows this has been accepted [1], however I don't see that
it's still applied.


[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20201118230414.121316-1-aford173@gmail.com/

Can you apply it?  It looks like building the device tree is throwing
messages because this is missing.

adam
>
> adam

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ