[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e94a048-3300-19f0-2106-a838af0b3731@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 11:26:43 +1100
From: imran.f.khan@...cle.com
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: jiangshanlai@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] workqueue: Introduce __show_worker_pool_state and
__show_workqueue_state.
Hi Tejun,
Sorry for getting back late on this.
On 12/10/21 3:48 am, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 08:38:41AM +1100, Imran Khan wrote:
>> So divide show_workqueue_state into more granular functions
>> (__show_workqueue_state and __show_worker_pool_state), that would show
>
> This is nit-picky but can we please name them sth like
> show_one_workqueue_state() and show_one_worker_pool_state() or just
> show_one_workqueue() and show_one_worker_pool() with the corresponding
> versions renamed to show_all_workqueues() and show_all_worker_pools()?
>
Yes. This sounds good to me. I have renamed the functions as
show_one_workqueue() and show_one_worker_pool(). On the same lines I
have renamed show_workqueue_state() to show_all_workqueues(). These
changes are available in v3 of the patch [1].
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211016002007.143661-1-imran.f.khan@oracle.com/
Thanks again for reviewing this.
-- Imran
> Thanks.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists