[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211016060429.783447-1-dqfext@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 14:04:29 +0800
From: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
To: Alvin Šipraga <alvin@...s.dk>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 5/7] net: dsa: tag_rtl8_4: add realtek 8 byte protocol 4 tag
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:10:26PM +0200, Alvin Šipraga wrote:
> +static struct sk_buff *rtl8_4_tag_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> + struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev);
> + __be16 *tag;
> +
> + /* Pad out so the (stripped) packet is at least 64 bytes long
> + * (including FCS), otherwise the switch will drop the packet.
> + * Then we need an additional 8 bytes for the Realtek tag.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(__skb_put_padto(skb, ETH_ZLEN + RTL8_4_TAG_LEN, false)))
> + return NULL;
Is this still required if you set rtl8365mb_cpu_rxlen to 64 bytes already?
> +
> + skb_push(skb, RTL8_4_TAG_LEN);
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists