lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dba463cb-3f1e-0972-aeaf-099d7c12bd0e@kernel.dk>
Date:   Sun, 17 Oct 2021 06:59:22 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] cache request_queue pointer

On 10/14/21 8:03 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Cache request_queue in bdev and replace two derefs in
> bdev->bd_disk->queue with bdev->bd_queue. Benchmarking
> with nullblk gave me around +1% to peak perf.
> 
> All patches are self contained and don't rely on others from
> the set including 1/5 and can be taken separately. And some
> changes go in separate patches to minimise conflicts. When
> we agree on the approach, I'll send the rest converting some
> other spots out of block.

Looks fine to me. Christoph, any concerns?

One note, though - s/fater/faster in patches 2..5 in the commit
message.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ