[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211017153659.6db1a442@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 15:36:59 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
<lars@...afoo.de>, <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: buffer: Fix memory leak in
iio_buffers_alloc_sysfs_and_mask()
On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 22:41:20 +0800
Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com> wrote:
> When 'iio_dev_opaque->buffer_ioctl_handler' alloc fails in
> iio_buffers_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(), the 'attrs' allocated in
> iio_buffer_register_legacy_sysfs_groups() will be leaked:
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff888108568d00 (size 128):
> comm "88", pid 2014, jiffies 4294963294 (age 26.920s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 80 3e da 02 80 88 ff ff 00 3a da 02 80 88 ff ff .>.......:......
> 00 35 da 02 80 88 ff ff 00 38 da 02 80 88 ff ff .5.......8......
> backtrace:
> [<0000000095a9e51e>] __kmalloc+0x1a3/0x2f0
> [<00000000faa3735e>] iio_buffers_alloc_sysfs_and_mask+0xfa3/0x1480 [industrialio]
> [<00000000a46384dc>] __iio_device_register+0x52e/0x1b40 [industrialio]
> [<00000000210af05e>] __devm_iio_device_register+0x22/0x80 [industrialio]
> [<00000000730d7b41>] adjd_s311_probe+0x195/0x200 [adjd_s311]
> [<00000000c0f70eb9>] i2c_device_probe+0xa07/0xbb0
> [<00000000b721e9ec>] really_probe+0x285/0xc30
> [<00000000e6690642>] __driver_probe_device+0x35f/0x4f0
> [<000000003ee4152f>] driver_probe_device+0x4f/0x140
> [<0000000055cfdd2f>] __device_attach_driver+0x24c/0x330
> [<0000000098033282>] bus_for_each_drv+0x15d/0x1e0
> [<00000000fa1876f5>] __device_attach+0x267/0x410
> [<00000000838ca724>] bus_probe_device+0x1ec/0x2a0
> [<00000000f4ce978e>] device_add+0xc3d/0x2020
> [<000000000ee12e9b>] i2c_new_client_device+0x614/0xb00
> [<00000000fc5d3221>] new_device_store+0x1f4/0x410
>
> Call iio_buffer_unregister_legacy_sysfs_groups() in error path
> to fix this.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Fixes: d9a625744ed0 ("iio: core: merge buffer/ & scan_elements/ attributes")
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Hi
Another good find, but I'd like to handle this one slightly differently.
This is directly calling the unwind of something done deep in a function called
by this one. That's not a clear structure though I can see you copied it from
iio_buffers_free_sysfs_and_mask() (which will also need modification).
This cleanup needs to be in __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask() which will need to
take an additional parameter (index) so that we know we are on index == 0 and hence
do the legacy cleanup.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index ae0912a14578..ba1c5c898e53 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -1630,7 +1630,7 @@ int iio_buffers_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> iio_dev_opaque->buffer_ioctl_handler = kzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!iio_dev_opaque->buffer_ioctl_handler) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto error_unwind_sysfs_and_mask;
> + goto error_unregister_legacy_sysfs_groups;
> }
>
> iio_dev_opaque->buffer_ioctl_handler->ioctl = iio_device_buffer_ioctl;
> @@ -1639,6 +1639,8 @@ int iio_buffers_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>
> return 0;
>
> +error_unregister_legacy_sysfs_groups:
> + iio_buffer_unregister_legacy_sysfs_groups(indio_dev);
> error_unwind_sysfs_and_mask:
> for (; unwind_idx >= 0; unwind_idx--) {
> buffer = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers[unwind_idx];
Powered by blists - more mailing lists