linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: adc: tsc2046: fix scan interval warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 17 Oct 2021 17:24:35 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>,
        Robin van der Gracht <robin@...tonic.nl>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: adc: tsc2046: fix scan interval warning

On Thu,  7 Oct 2021 11:30:06 +0200
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de> wrote:

> Sync if statement with the actual warning.
> 
> Fixes: 9504db5765e8 ("iio: adc: tsc2046: fix a warning message in tsc2046_adc_update_scan_mode()")
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Applied this one to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git and marked it for stable.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c
> index 170950d5dd49..d84ae6b008c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-tsc2046.c
> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static int tsc2046_adc_update_scan_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  	priv->xfer.len = size;
>  	priv->time_per_scan_us = size * 8 * priv->time_per_bit_ns / NSEC_PER_USEC;
>  
> -	if (priv->scan_interval_us > priv->time_per_scan_us)
> +	if (priv->scan_interval_us < priv->time_per_scan_us)
>  		dev_warn(&priv->spi->dev, "The scan interval (%d) is less then calculated scan time (%d)\n",
>  			 priv->scan_interval_us, priv->time_per_scan_us);
>