lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 21:38:48 +0200 From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: bug.h: add unreachable() in BUG() for CONFIG_BUG not set On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 9:27 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote: > On 10/17/21 12:24 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 9:17 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote: > >> On 10/17/21 12:09 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >>> On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 7:49 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote: > >> > >>> Did you see any other issues like this one on m68k, or the > >>> same one on another architecture? > >> > >> No and no. > > > > Ok, maybe before we waste too much time on it, just add an extra > > return statement to afs_dir_set_page_dirty()? > > I think that patch has already been rejected a few times... Indeed, this is one I had looked at before: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAK8P3a3L6B9HXsOXSu9_c6pz1kN91Vig6EPsetLuYVW=M72XaQ@mail.gmail.com/ It seems that this version: +#define BUG() do { \ + do {} while (1); \ + unreachable(); \ + } while (0) ended up being one that didn't see any objections. Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists