[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWulU30/yZaDeoAS@google.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 21:23:47 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Input: ads7846: ads7846_get_value - fix unaligned
pointer value warning
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 09:51:54AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 10:04:16PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Oleksij,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 02:41:15PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > Fix warning reported by the kernel test robot:
> > > drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c:705:24: warning: taking address
> > > of packed member 'data' of class or structure 'ads7846_buf' may result
> > > in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member]
> > >
> > > Fixes: 6965eece2a89 ("Input: ads7846 - convert to one message")
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c
> > > index adb4c2230c31..1987dedac94f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c
> > > @@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ static int ads7846_get_value(struct ads7846_buf *buf)
> > > {
> > > int value;
> > >
> > > - value = be16_to_cpup(&buf->data);
> > > + value = get_unaligned_be16(&buf->data);
> >
> > ds7846_buf is declared as packed so I believe using be16_to_cpu(buf->data)
> > will suffice.
>
> The pointer to the data is is off by 8 bits, so it is not naturally
> aligned. This is why we need to use function which is dealing with
> unaligned pointers.
As I mentioned, the structure is packed, so the compiler will take care
of doing unaligned access safely on architectures that can not tolerate
it.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists