linux-kernel - [TEST PATCH] rtc-cmos: cmos_read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211017194153.277610-1-mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Date:   Sun, 17 Oct 2021 21:41:53 +0200
From:   Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@...pl>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@...pl>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Subject: [TEST PATCH] rtc-cmos: cmos_read_alarm bug demonstration

Before my commit "rtc-cmos: dont touch alarm registers during update",
applying this patch and reading the CMOS time like so:

        while true; do cat /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/time ; sleep 0.5; done

produces errors in dmesg.

Signed-off-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@...pl>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>

---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
index f353a41dfe8c..c24465f7bed4 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@
 #include <linux/dmi.h>
 #endif
 
+#include <linux/ktime.h>
+#include <linux/timekeeping.h>
+
 /* this is for "generic access to PC-style RTC" using CMOS_READ/CMOS_WRITE */
 #include <linux/mc146818rtc.h>
 
@@ -220,6 +223,8 @@ static inline void cmos_write_bank2(unsigned char val, unsigned char addr)
 
 /*----------------------------------------------------------------*/
 
+static void cmos_read_alarm_uip_debugging(struct device *dev);
+
 static int cmos_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *t)
 {
 	/*
@@ -234,6 +239,8 @@ static int cmos_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *t)
 	 * That'll make Y3K compatility (year > 2070) easy!
 	 */
 	mc146818_get_time(t);
+
+	cmos_read_alarm_uip_debugging(dev);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -348,6 +355,60 @@ static int cmos_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *t)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void cmos_read_alarm_uip_debugging(struct device *dev)
+{
+	unsigned long	flags;
+	unsigned char	rtc_uip_baseline, rtc_uip;
+	struct rtc_wkalrm t_baseline, t;
+	ktime_t time_start, time_end;
+	int i;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc_lock, flags);
+	rtc_uip_baseline = CMOS_READ(RTC_FREQ_SELECT) & RTC_UIP;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc_lock, flags);
+
+	cmos_read_alarm(dev, &t_baseline);
+
+	time_start = ktime_get();
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 2000; i++) {
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc_lock, flags);
+		rtc_uip = CMOS_READ(RTC_FREQ_SELECT) & RTC_UIP;
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc_lock, flags);
+
+		cmos_read_alarm(dev, &t);
+
+		if (t_baseline.time.tm_sec != t.time.tm_sec) {
+			dev_err(dev,
+				"Inconsistent alarm tm_sec value: %d != %d (RTC_UIP = %d; %d)\n",
+				t_baseline.time.tm_sec,
+				t.time.tm_sec,
+				rtc_uip_baseline, rtc_uip);
+		}
+		if (t_baseline.time.tm_min != t.time.tm_min) {
+			dev_err(dev,
+				"Inconsistent alarm tm_min value: %d != %d (RTC_UIP = %d; %d)\n",
+				t_baseline.time.tm_min,
+				t.time.tm_min,
+				rtc_uip_baseline, rtc_uip);
+		}
+		if (t_baseline.time.tm_hour != t.time.tm_hour) {
+			dev_err(dev,
+				"Inconsistent alarm tm_hour value: %d != %d (RTC_UIP = %d; %d)\n",
+				t_baseline.time.tm_hour,
+				t.time.tm_hour,
+				rtc_uip_baseline, rtc_uip);
+		}
+
+	}
+
+	time_end = ktime_get();
+
+	pr_info_ratelimited("%s: loop executed in %lld ns\n",
+			__func__, ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(time_end, time_start)));
+}
+
+
 static void cmos_checkintr(struct cmos_rtc *cmos, unsigned char rtc_control)
 {
 	unsigned char	rtc_intr;
-- 
2.25.1