[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87v91v2zkk.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 21:58:35 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/10] x86/tdx: Handle port I/O
On Tue, Oct 05 2021 at 13:41, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> \
> static inline void outs##bwl(int port, const void *addr, unsigned long count) \
> { \
> - if (sev_key_active()) { \
> + if (sev_key_active() || \
> + cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_UNROLL_STRING_IO)) { \
Instead of adding an extra check, can you please replace that
sev_key_active() with cc_platform_has() completely?
> +/*
> + * tdx_handle_early_io() cannot be re-used in #VE handler for handling
> + * I/O because the way of handling string I/O is different between
> + * normal and early I/O case. Also, once trace support is enabled,
> + * tdx_handle_io() will be extended to use trace calls which is also
> + * not valid for early I/O cases.
> + */
> +static void tdx_handle_io(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 exit_qual)
> +{
> + struct tdx_hypercall_output outh;
> + int out, size, port, ret;
> + bool string;
> + u64 mask;
> +
> + string = VE_IS_IO_STRING(exit_qual);
> +
> + /* I/O strings ops are unrolled at build time. */
Fancy. The compiler can evaluate sev_key_active() and
cc_platform_has() at build time?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists