lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 10:57:49 +0100 From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>, Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>, Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@...gle.com>, Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Add basic ARMv8.6 support Hi Daniel, On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 22:59:33 +0100, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote: > > > Hi Marc, > > > On 11/10/2021 15:39, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > [ ... ] > > > Thanks for that. All addressed now. I'll repost the series once we've > > addressed the question below. > > > >> How do you want to merge this series? It would be nice to have the arch > >> bits in the arm64 tree, if possible, as we'll be tripping over the cpucaps > >> stuff otherwise. > > > > I think we should keep the series together, as asm/arch_timer.h gets a > > beating all over the place, and there is no chance the arm64 bits at > > the end can apply (let alone work) on their own. > > > > So either Daniel would ack the series for it to go via arm64, or > > create a stable branch with the first 13 patches that would go in both > > the clocksource and arm64 trees. > > > > Daniel, any preference? > > yes, I prefer a stable branch for this series. > > https://git.linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linux.git/log/?h=timers/drivers/armv8.6_arch_timer > OK, this branch is now slightly outdated, since I have reworked it at Will's request. -rc5 is also too recent a base for arm64, which is usually based on -rc3. I'll repost a new series today or tomorrow and provide tags for both you and Will to pull from. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists