linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 4/7] soc: mediatek: mutex: add functions that operate registers by CMDQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c30de071-0ac4-bbbe-bde3-770c2a15025d@collabora.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Oct 2021 15:50:17 +0200
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Moudy Ho <moudy.ho@...iatek.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
Cc:     Maoguang Meng <maoguang.meng@...iatek.com>,
        daoyuan huang <daoyuan.huang@...iatek.com>,
        Ping-Hsun Wu <ping-hsun.wu@...iatek.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tfiga@...omium.org, drinkcat@...omium.org, acourbot@...omium.org,
        pihsun@...omium.org, menghui.lin@...iatek.com,
        sj.huang@...iatek.com, allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com,
        randy.wu@...iatek.com, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
        hsinyi@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/7] soc: mediatek: mutex: add functions that operate
 registers by CMDQ

> Considering that some functions have timing requirements
> in specific situation, this patch adds several interface that
> operate registers by CMDQ.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Moudy Ho <moudy.ho@...iatek.com>
> ---
>   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c       | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.h |  6 +++
>   2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> index adab4c9edc16..874d4c60b844 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> @@ -7,10 +7,12 @@
>   #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>   #include <linux/module.h>
>   #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>   #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>   #include <linux/regmap.h>
>   #include <linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h>
>   #include <linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h>
>   
>   #define MT2701_MUTEX0_MOD0			0x2c
>   #define MT2701_MUTEX0_SOF0			0x30
> @@ -143,6 +145,8 @@ struct mtk_mutex_ctx {
>   	void __iomem			*regs;
>   	struct mtk_mutex		mutex[10];
>   	const struct mtk_mutex_data	*data;
> +	phys_addr_t			addr;
> +	u8				subsys_id;
>   };
>   
>   static const unsigned int mt2701_mutex_mod[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = {
> @@ -442,6 +446,25 @@ void mtk_mutex_remove_comp(struct mtk_mutex *mutex,
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mutex_remove_comp);
>   
> +void mtk_mutex_add_mod_by_cmdq(struct mtk_mutex *mutex, u32 mod,
> +			       struct mmsys_cmdq_cmd *cmd)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_mutex_ctx *mtx = container_of(mutex, struct mtk_mutex_ctx,
> +						 mutex[mutex->id]);
> +	unsigned int offset;
> +
> +	WARN_ON(&mtx->mutex[mutex->id] != mutex);
> +
> +	offset = DISP_REG_MUTEX_MOD(mtx->data->mutex_mod_reg, mutex->id);
> +	cmdq_pkt_write_mask(cmd->pkt, mtx->subsys_id, mtx->addr + offset,
> +			    mod, mtx->data->mutex_mdp_mod_mask);
> +
> +	offset = DISP_REG_MUTEX_SOF(mtx->data->mutex_sof_reg, mutex->id);
> +	cmdq_pkt_write_mask(cmd->pkt, mtx->subsys_id, mtx->addr + offset,
> +			    0, mtx->data->mutex_mdp_sof_mask);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mutex_add_mod_by_cmdq);
> +
>   void mtk_mutex_enable(struct mtk_mutex *mutex)
>   {
>   	struct mtk_mutex_ctx *mtx = container_of(mutex, struct mtk_mutex_ctx,
> @@ -453,6 +476,20 @@ void mtk_mutex_enable(struct mtk_mutex *mutex)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mutex_enable);
>   
> +void mtk_mutex_enable_by_cmdq(struct mtk_mutex *mutex,
> +			      struct mmsys_cmdq_cmd *cmd)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_mutex_ctx *mtx = container_of(mutex, struct mtk_mutex_ctx,
> +						 mutex[mutex->id]);
> +
> +	WARN_ON(&mtx->mutex[mutex->id] != mutex);
> +
> +	cmdq_pkt_write_mask(cmd->pkt, mtx->subsys_id,
> +			    mtx->addr + DISP_REG_MUTEX_EN(mutex->id),
> +			    0x1, 0x00000001);

(don't use this definition name if not appropriate)
#define MTK_MUTEX_ENABLE	BIT(0)

cmdq_pkt_write_mask(cmd->pkt, mtx->subsys_id,

		    mtx->addr + DISP_REG_MUTEX_EN(mutex->id),

		    MTK_MUTEX_ENABLE, MTK_MUTEX_ENABLE);

...or anyway remove leading zeros.

> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mutex_enable_by_cmdq);
> +
>   void mtk_mutex_disable(struct mtk_mutex *mutex)
>   {
>   	struct mtk_mutex_ctx *mtx = container_of(mutex, struct mtk_mutex_ctx,
> @@ -464,6 +501,20 @@ void mtk_mutex_disable(struct mtk_mutex *mutex)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mutex_disable);
>   
> +void mtk_mutex_disable_by_cmdq(struct mtk_mutex *mutex,
> +			       struct mmsys_cmdq_cmd *cmd)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_mutex_ctx *mtx = container_of(mutex, struct mtk_mutex_ctx,
> +						 mutex[mutex->id]);
> +
> +	WARN_ON(&mtx->mutex[mutex->id] != mutex);
> +
> +	cmdq_pkt_write_mask(cmd->pkt, mtx->subsys_id,
> +			    mtx->addr + DISP_REG_MUTEX_EN(mutex->id),
> +			    0x0, 0x00000001);

cmdq_pkt_write_mask(cmd->pkt, mtx->subsys_id,


		    mtx->addr + DISP_REG_MUTEX_EN(mutex->id),


		    0, MTK_MUTEX_ENABLE);

> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mutex_disable_by_cmdq);
> +

Regards,
- Angelo