linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] staging: r8188eu: Remove redundant 'if' statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YW2H63JAWKcM6+hL@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Oct 2021 16:42:51 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
Cc:     Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
        Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] staging: r8188eu: Remove redundant 'if' statement

On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 04:28:12PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> Remove a redundant 'if' statement.
> 
> Acked-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
> Acked-by: Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

Why is there not a "v2" in the subject line like the other patches in
this series?

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c
> index 6fb79d711692..42084b029473 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c
> @@ -254,12 +254,6 @@ int rtw_cmd_thread(void *context)
>  	while (1) {
>  		wait_for_completion(&pcmdpriv->enqueue_cmd);
>  
> -		if (padapter->bDriverStopped ||
> -		    padapter->bSurpriseRemoved) {
> -			DBG_88E("%s: DriverStopped(%d) SurpriseRemoved(%d) break at line %d\n",
> -				__func__, padapter->bDriverStopped, padapter->bSurpriseRemoved, __LINE__);
> -			break;
> -		}


Why is this redundant?

It is not obvious from the diff what is going on so you should say a bit
more in the changelog text please.

thanks,

greg k-h