linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6655: Fix line wrapping in rf.c file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YW2O3wC8wMEKS3Ub@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Oct 2021 17:12:31 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@...il.com>
Cc:     outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com, forest@...ttletooquiet.net,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6655: Fix line wrapping in rf.c file

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 04:05:26PM +0100, Karolina Drobnik wrote:
> Fix line length warnings raised by checkpatch.pl in
> rf.c file for `RFvWriteWakeProgSyn`,`RFbRawSetPower`
> and `RFbAL7230SelectChannelPostProcess`functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.c
> index a6f17162d017..206d34b555bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.c
> @@ -699,11 +699,17 @@ bool RFvWriteWakeProgSyn(struct vnt_private *priv, unsigned char byRFType,
>  			return false;
>  
>  		for (ii = 0; ii < CB_AL2230_INIT_SEQ; ii++)
> -			MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, (unsigned short)(MISCFIFO_SYNDATA_IDX + ii), dwAL2230InitTable[ii]);
> +			MACvSetMISCFifo(priv,
> +					(unsigned short)(MISCFIFO_SYNDATA_IDX + ii),
> +					dwAL2230InitTable[ii]);
>  
> -		MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, (unsigned short)(MISCFIFO_SYNDATA_IDX + ii), dwAL2230ChannelTable0[uChannel - 1]);
> +		MACvSetMISCFifo(priv,
> +				(unsigned short)(MISCFIFO_SYNDATA_IDX + ii),
> +				dwAL2230ChannelTable0[uChannel - 1]);
>  		ii++;
> -		MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, (unsigned short)(MISCFIFO_SYNDATA_IDX + ii), dwAL2230ChannelTable1[uChannel - 1]);
> +		MACvSetMISCFifo(priv,
> +				(unsigned short)(MISCFIFO_SYNDATA_IDX + ii),
> +				dwAL2230ChannelTable1[uChannel - 1]);
>  		break;
>  
>  		/* Need to check, PLLON need to be low for channel setting */
> @@ -716,17 +722,28 @@ bool RFvWriteWakeProgSyn(struct vnt_private *priv, unsigned char byRFType,
>  
>  		if (uChannel <= CB_MAX_CHANNEL_24G) {
>  			for (ii = 0; ii < CB_AL7230_INIT_SEQ; ii++)
> -				MACvSetMISCFifo(priv, (unsigned short)(MISCFIFO_SYNDATA_IDX + ii), dwAL7230InitTable[ii]);
> +				MACvSetMISCFifo(priv,
> +						(unsigned short)(MISCFIFO_SYNDATA_IDX
> +						+ ii), dwAL7230InitTable[ii]);

You shouldn't put the "+" on the start of a new line.

Also, these are all just fine as-is for now.  A better way to make these
lines smaller is to use better variable and function names that are
shorter and make sense :)

thanks,

greg k-h