lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Oct 2021 20:47:11 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Luo Jie <luoj@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sricharan@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/13] net: phy: add qca8081 ethernet phy driver

> @@ -1441,6 +1455,7 @@ static struct mdio_device_id __maybe_unused atheros_tbl[] = {
>  	{ PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(ATH8032_PHY_ID) },
>  	{ PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(ATH8035_PHY_ID) },
>  	{ PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(ATH9331_PHY_ID) },
> +	{ PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(QCA8081_PHY_ID) },
>  	{ }

What tree is this against? I have:

static struct mdio_device_id __maybe_unused atheros_tbl[] = {
        { ATH8030_PHY_ID, AT8030_PHY_ID_MASK },
        { PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(ATH8031_PHY_ID) },
        { PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(ATH8032_PHY_ID) },
        { PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(ATH8035_PHY_ID) },
        { PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(ATH9331_PHY_ID) },
        { PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(QCA8337_PHY_ID) },
        { PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(QCA8327_A_PHY_ID) },
        { PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(QCA8327_B_PHY_ID) },
        { PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(QCA9561_PHY_ID) },
        { }
};

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ