[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211018175505.3e19155a@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 17:55:14 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
王贇 <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing: Have all levels of checks prevent recursion
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 15:44:12 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> (by way of Steven Rostedt
<rostedt@...dmis.org>) wrote:
> [
> Linus,
> I have patches that clean this up that are not marked for stable, but
> will depend on this patch. As I already have commits in my next queue,
> I can do one of the following:
>
> 1. Cherry pick this from my urgent tree, and build everything on top.
> 2. Add this on top of the mainline tag my next branch is based on and
> merge it.
> 3. Add this to my next branch, and have it go in at the next merge
> window.
Hmm, I take this back. Although the clean up affects the same code block,
the updates don't actually conflict. (Although, if I do update the comment
that Petr asked, that will conflict. But nothing you can't handle ;-)
I'll start running this change through my tests and post it separately.
-- Steve
> ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists