[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211018062504.116652-1-guangming.cao@mediatek.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 14:25:04 +0800
From: <guangming.cao@...iatek.com>
To: <daniel@...ll.ch>
CC: <Brian.Starkey@....com>, <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
<christian.koenig@....com>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<guangming.cao@...iatek.com>, <hridya@...gle.com>,
<isaacm@...eaurora.org>, <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
<labbott@...hat.com>, <linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <lmark@...eaurora.org>,
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <sspatil@...gle.com>,
<sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>,
Guangming Cao <Guangming.Cao@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: Add support for mapping buffers with DMA attributes
From: Guangming Cao <Guangming.Cao@...iatek.com>
On Tue, 2021-08-31 at 14:47 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:39:11AM +0800, guangming.cao@...iatek.com
> wrote:
> > From: Guangming Cao <Guangming.Cao@...iatek.com>
> >
> > When mapping the memory represented by a dma-buf into a device's
> > address space, it might be desireable to map the memory with
> > certain DMA attributes. Thus, introduce the dma_mapping_attrs
> > field in the dma_buf_attachment structure so that when
> > the memory is mapped with dma_buf_map_attachment, it is mapped
> > with the desired DMA attributes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacm@...eaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Guangming Cao <Guangming.Cao@...iatek.com>
>
> Can you pls include the code that's going to use this here too?
>
> At a glance all the attributes you might want to set are supposed to
> be
> under the control of the exporter, not the importer.
> -Daniel
>
Hi Daniel,
Sorry for the late. Currently I couldn't upload the coding going to use
this part because of some miscellaneous reasons.
Just as I said in commit message, for dma_heap, users can't skip cache
sync or other opetrations when map iova[dma_buf_map_attachment] by
fill (struct dma_buf_attachment).dma_map_attrs, it's not dma_map_attrs
expected(link:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst#dma_attr_skip_cpu_sync
).
Correspondingly, if they use dma_buf to map iova[dma_buf_map_attrs],
they will not meet this issue. So, I think it's a design flaw for
dma_heap.
BRs!
Guangming
> > ---
> > drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c | 6 ++++--
> > drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c | 6 ++++--
> > include/linux/dma-buf.h | 3 +++
> > 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c b/drivers/dma-
> > buf/heaps/cma_heap.c
> > index 0c05b79870f9..2c9feb3bfc3e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c
> > @@ -99,9 +99,10 @@ static struct sg_table
> > *cma_heap_map_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachme
> > {
> > struct dma_heap_attachment *a = attachment->priv;
> > struct sg_table *table = &a->table;
> > + int attrs = attachment->dma_map_attrs;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - ret = dma_map_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, direction, 0);
> > + ret = dma_map_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, direction,
> > attrs);
> > if (ret)
> > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > a->mapped = true;
> > @@ -113,9 +114,10 @@ static void cma_heap_unmap_dma_buf(struct
> > dma_buf_attachment *attachment,
> > enum dma_data_direction direction)
> > {
> > struct dma_heap_attachment *a = attachment->priv;
> > + int attrs = attachment->dma_map_attrs;
> >
> > a->mapped = false;
> > - dma_unmap_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, direction, 0);
> > + dma_unmap_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, direction, attrs);
> > }
> >
> > static int cma_heap_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf
> > *dmabuf,
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c b/drivers/dma-
> > buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> > index 23a7e74ef966..fc7b1e02988e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> > @@ -130,9 +130,10 @@ static struct sg_table
> > *system_heap_map_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attac
> > {
> > struct dma_heap_attachment *a = attachment->priv;
> > struct sg_table *table = a->table;
> > + int attrs = attachment->dma_map_attrs;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - ret = dma_map_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, direction, 0);
> > + ret = dma_map_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, direction,
> > attrs);
> > if (ret)
> > return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >
> > @@ -145,9 +146,10 @@ static void system_heap_unmap_dma_buf(struct
> > dma_buf_attachment *attachment,
> > enum dma_data_direction
> > direction)
> > {
> > struct dma_heap_attachment *a = attachment->priv;
> > + int attrs = attachment->dma_map_attrs;
> >
> > a->mapped = false;
> > - dma_unmap_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, direction, 0);
> > + dma_unmap_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, direction, attrs);
> > }
> >
> > static int system_heap_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf
> > *dmabuf,
> > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> > index efdc56b9d95f..4d650731766e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> > @@ -379,6 +379,8 @@ struct dma_buf_attach_ops {
> > * @importer_ops: importer operations for this attachment, if
> > provided
> > * dma_buf_map/unmap_attachment() must be called with the dma_resv
> > lock held.
> > * @importer_priv: importer specific attachment data.
> > + * @dma_map_attrs: DMA attributes to be used when the exporter
> > maps the buffer
> > + * through dma_buf_map_attachment.
> > *
> > * This structure holds the attachment information between the
> > dma_buf buffer
> > * and its user device(s). The list contains one attachment struct
> > per device
> > @@ -399,6 +401,7 @@ struct dma_buf_attachment {
> > const struct dma_buf_attach_ops *importer_ops;
> > void *importer_priv;
> > void *priv;
> > + unsigned long dma_map_attrs;
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists