lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 16:27:17 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org> Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] powerpc: Prepare func_desc_t for refactorisation Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of October 17, 2021 10:38 pm: > In preparation of making func_desc_t generic, change the ELFv2 > version to a struct containing 'addr' element. > > This allows using single helpers common to ELFv1 and ELFv2. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> > --- > arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c > index a89da0ee25e2..b687ef88c4c4 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c > @@ -33,19 +33,13 @@ > #ifdef PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2 > > /* An address is simply the address of the function. */ > -typedef unsigned long func_desc_t; > +typedef struct { > + unsigned long addr; > +} func_desc_t; I'm not quite following why this change is done. I guess it is so you can move this func_desc_t type into core code, but why do that? Is it just to avoid using the preprocessor? On its own this patch looks okay. Acked-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists