[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f66d234-3624-7ba2-7b03-5d0e1bea087f@csgroup.eu>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:08:54 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] powerpc: Prepare func_desc_t for refactorisation
Le 18/10/2021 à 08:27, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of October 17, 2021 10:38 pm:
>> In preparation of making func_desc_t generic, change the ELFv2
>> version to a struct containing 'addr' element.
>>
>> This allows using single helpers common to ELFv1 and ELFv2.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
>> index a89da0ee25e2..b687ef88c4c4 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
>> @@ -33,19 +33,13 @@
>> #ifdef PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2
>>
>> /* An address is simply the address of the function. */
>> -typedef unsigned long func_desc_t;
>> +typedef struct {
>> + unsigned long addr;
>> +} func_desc_t;
>
> I'm not quite following why this change is done. I guess it is so you
> can move this func_desc_t type into core code, but why do that? Is it
> just to avoid using the preprocessor?
I explained it in patch 7 but yes it probably also deserves some more
explanation here as well.
That's right, it's to avoid having to spread #ifdefs everywhere.
>
> On its own this patch looks okay.
>
> Acked-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists