linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211018194533.7af364fa@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:45:33 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

Hi Andy,

On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:01:18 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 6:49 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 16:14:56 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:  
> > >
> > > Thanks! As a quick fix looks good, but I think we need a separate header for
> > > those _*_IP_ macros.  
> >
> > Like this (on top of my previous fix - which I assume Andrew will
> > squash out of existence)?  
> 
> Yep, thanks!
> I thought that it makes sense to have STACK_MAGIC also in this header. Thoughts?

You might want to think of a different name for the header file then.

> 
> One spelling correction below.
> 
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:27:54 +1100
> > Subject: [PATCH] kernel.h: split out instrcutions pointer accessors  
> 
> instructions

instruction ?  :-)

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped