[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26612614156b53a3c1798f86177a69f613f210b7.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:40:45 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, andrew@...n.ch, lars.povlsen@...rochip.com,
Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: reset: Add lan966x support
On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 16:14 +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
[...]
> Were you thinking to have just another reset driver('phy-reset') and then
> the switch to refer to both of them?
> I like this idea because then is more clear what is doing each driver.
Yes, especially if there is no requirement to handle switch and PHY
resets at the same time: this would allow the sgpio driver to trigger
the required switch reset without already releasing the PHYs from reset.
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists