| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <7a02cb0a-3360-4512-2425-8096d153ae48@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:11:40 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Petr Benes <petrben@...il.com>
Cc: Michal Vokáč <michal.vokac@...ft.com>,
Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...labora.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Petr Beneš <petr.benes@...ft.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: imx: Fix temperature measurements on i.MX6 after
alarm
I'm not seeing any thermal zone definitions in the DT for imx6 and imx7.
Am I missing something ?
On 18/10/2021 10:36, Petr Benes wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 00:23, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/10/2021 10:11, Michal Vokáč wrote:
>>> From: Petr Beneš <petr.benes@...ft.com>
>>>
>>> SoC temperature readout may not work after thermal alarm fires interrupt.
>>> This harms userspace as well as CPU cooling device.
>>>
>>> Two issues with the logic involved. First, there is no protection against
>>> concurent measurements, hence one can switch the sensor off while
>>> the other one tries to read temperature later. Second, the interrupt path
>>> usually fails. At the end the sensor is powered off and thermal IRQ is
>>> disabled. One has to reenable the thermal zone by the sysfs interface.
>>>
>>> Most of troubles come from commit d92ed2c9d3ff ("thermal: imx: Use
>>> driver's local data to decide whether to run a measurement")
>>
>> Are these troubles observed and reproduced ? Or is it your understanding
>> from reading the code ?
>
> Yes, it is observed. We are using:
> CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL=y
> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_THERMAL=y
> If the SoC temperature oscillates around the passive trip point, it is not
> possible to read out /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp after
> a while (minutes). For reproduction either heat the device up a bit or set
> the passive trip point lower.
>
>>
>> get_temp() and tz enable/disable are protected against races in the core
>> code via the tz mutex
>
> imx_get_temp() itself doesn't handle concurrent invocations properly, despite
> it may seem it does. The sensor is switched on/off without control.
> That is a flaw in imx_get_temp().
> No evidence the core locking is wrong.
>
> data->irq_enabled is set to false in imx_thermal_alarm_irq() each time
> the interrupt arrives. imx_get_temp() does wrong decision based
> on the value later.
>
>>
>>> It uses data->irq_enabled as the "local data". Indeed, its value is
>>> related to the state of the sensor loosely under normal operation and,
>>> frankly, gets unleashed when the thermal interrupt arrives.
>>>
>>> Current patch adds the "local data" (new member sensor_on in
>>> imx_thermal_data) and sets its value in controlled manner.>
>>> Fixes: d92ed2c9d3ff ("thermal: imx: Use driver's local data to decide whether to run a measurement")
>>> Cc: petrben@...il.com
>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Petr Beneš <petr.benes@...ft.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Vokáč <michal.vokac@...ft.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
>>> index 2c7473d86a59..df5658e21828 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
>>> @@ -209,6 +209,8 @@ struct imx_thermal_data {
>>> struct clk *thermal_clk;
>>> const struct thermal_soc_data *socdata;
>>> const char *temp_grade;
>>> + struct mutex sensor_lock;
>>> + bool sensor_on;
>>> };
>>>
>>> static void imx_set_panic_temp(struct imx_thermal_data *data,
>>> @@ -252,11 +254,12 @@ static int imx_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
>>> const struct thermal_soc_data *soc_data = data->socdata;
>>> struct regmap *map = data->tempmon;
>>> unsigned int n_meas;
>>> - bool wait, run_measurement;
>>> + bool wait;
>>> u32 val;
>>>
>>> - run_measurement = !data->irq_enabled;
>>> - if (!run_measurement) {
>>> + mutex_lock(&data->sensor_lock);
>>> +
>>> + if (data->sensor_on) {
>>> /* Check if a measurement is currently in progress */
>>> regmap_read(map, soc_data->temp_data, &val);
>>> wait = !(val & soc_data->temp_valid_mask);
>>> @@ -283,13 +286,15 @@ static int imx_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
>>>
>>> regmap_read(map, soc_data->temp_data, &val);
>>>
>>> - if (run_measurement) {
>>> + if (!data->sensor_on) {
>>> regmap_write(map, soc_data->sensor_ctrl + REG_CLR,
>>> soc_data->measure_temp_mask);
>>> regmap_write(map, soc_data->sensor_ctrl + REG_SET,
>>> soc_data->power_down_mask);
>>> }
>>>
>>> + mutex_unlock(&data->sensor_lock);
>>> +
>>> if ((val & soc_data->temp_valid_mask) == 0) {
>>> dev_dbg(&tz->device, "temp measurement never finished\n");
>>> return -EAGAIN;
>>> @@ -339,20 +344,26 @@ static int imx_change_mode(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
>>> const struct thermal_soc_data *soc_data = data->socdata;
>>>
>>> if (mode == THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED) {
>>> + mutex_lock(&data->sensor_lock);
>>> regmap_write(map, soc_data->sensor_ctrl + REG_CLR,
>>> soc_data->power_down_mask);
>>> regmap_write(map, soc_data->sensor_ctrl + REG_SET,
>>> soc_data->measure_temp_mask);
>>> + data->sensor_on = true;
>>> + mutex_unlock(&data->sensor_lock);
>>>
>>> if (!data->irq_enabled) {
>>> data->irq_enabled = true;
>>> enable_irq(data->irq);
>>> }
>>> } else {
>>> + mutex_lock(&data->sensor_lock);
>>> regmap_write(map, soc_data->sensor_ctrl + REG_CLR,
>>> soc_data->measure_temp_mask);
>>> regmap_write(map, soc_data->sensor_ctrl + REG_SET,
>>> soc_data->power_down_mask);
>>> + data->sensor_on = false;
>>> + mutex_unlock(&data->sensor_lock);
>>>
>>> if (data->irq_enabled) {
>>> disable_irq(data->irq);
>>> @@ -728,6 +739,8 @@ static int imx_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> }
>>>
>>> /* Make sure sensor is in known good state for measurements */
>>> + mutex_init(&data->sensor_lock);
>>> + mutex_lock(&data->sensor_lock);
>>> regmap_write(map, data->socdata->sensor_ctrl + REG_CLR,
>>> data->socdata->power_down_mask);
>>> regmap_write(map, data->socdata->sensor_ctrl + REG_CLR,
>>> @@ -739,6 +752,8 @@ static int imx_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> IMX6_MISC0_REFTOP_SELBIASOFF);
>>> regmap_write(map, data->socdata->sensor_ctrl + REG_SET,
>>> data->socdata->power_down_mask);
>>> + data->sensor_on = false;
>>> + mutex_unlock(&data->sensor_lock);
>>>
>>> ret = imx_thermal_register_legacy_cooling(data);
>>> if (ret)
>>> @@ -796,10 +811,13 @@ static int imx_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> if (data->socdata->version == TEMPMON_IMX6SX)
>>> imx_set_panic_temp(data, data->temp_critical);
>>>
>>> + mutex_lock(&data->sensor_lock);
>>> regmap_write(map, data->socdata->sensor_ctrl + REG_CLR,
>>> data->socdata->power_down_mask);
>>> regmap_write(map, data->socdata->sensor_ctrl + REG_SET,
>>> data->socdata->measure_temp_mask);
>>> + data->sensor_on = true;
>>> + mutex_unlock(&data->sensor_lock);
>>>
>>> data->irq_enabled = true;
>>> ret = thermal_zone_device_enable(data->tz);
>>> @@ -832,8 +850,12 @@ static int imx_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> struct regmap *map = data->tempmon;
>>>
>>> /* Disable measurements */
>>> + mutex_lock(&data->sensor_lock);
>>> regmap_write(map, data->socdata->sensor_ctrl + REG_SET,
>>> data->socdata->power_down_mask);
>>> + data->sensor_on = false;
>>> + mutex_unlock(&data->sensor_lock);
>>> +
>>> if (!IS_ERR(data->thermal_clk))
>>> clk_disable_unprepare(data->thermal_clk);
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>>
>> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
>> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
>> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists