linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm: msm: fix building without CONFIG_COMMON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:48:37 +0200
From:   Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
        Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@...eaurora.org>,
        Rajeev Nandan <rajeevny@...eaurora.org>,
        Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: msm: fix building without CONFIG_COMMON_CLK

Am 18.10.21 um 13:46 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 1:40 PM Christian König
> <christian.koenig@....com> wrote:
>>>> I have absolutely no idea how a platform can have IOMMU but no MMU
>>>> support but it indeed seems to be the case here.
>>> Huh?
>>>
>>> Parisc has config MMU def_bool y?
>> Then why vmap isn't available?
>>
>> See the mail thread: [linux-next:master 3576/7806]
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c:624:20: error: implicit declaration of
>> function 'vmap'
> This is just a missing "#include <linux/vmalloc.h>". It must be
> included indirectly
> on some architectures but not other.

Ah! Should I send a patch or you take care of that as well?

Thanks,
Christian.

>
>         Arnd