linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/vmalloc: fix numa spreading for large hash tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211018123710.1540996-2-chenwandun@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Oct 2021 20:37:09 +0800
From:   Chen Wandun <chenwandun@...wei.com>
To:     <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <npiggin@...il.com>,
        <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <edumazet@...gle.com>, <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        <guohanjun@...wei.com>, <shakeelb@...gle.com>, <urezki@...il.com>
CC:     <chenwandun@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/vmalloc: fix numa spreading for large hash tables

Eric Dumazet reported a strange numa spreading info in [1], and found
commit 121e6f3258fe ("mm/vmalloc: hugepage vmalloc mappings") introduced
this issue [2].

Dig into the difference before and after this patch, page allocation has
some difference:

before:
alloc_large_system_hash
    __vmalloc
        __vmalloc_node(..., NUMA_NO_NODE, ...)
            __vmalloc_node_range
                __vmalloc_area_node
                    alloc_page /* because NUMA_NO_NODE, so choose alloc_page branch */
                        alloc_pages_current
                            alloc_page_interleave /* can be proved by print policy mode */

after:
alloc_large_system_hash
    __vmalloc
        __vmalloc_node(..., NUMA_NO_NODE, ...)
            __vmalloc_node_range
                __vmalloc_area_node
                    alloc_pages_node /* choose nid by nuam_mem_id() */
                        __alloc_pages_node(nid, ....)

So after commit 121e6f3258fe ("mm/vmalloc: hugepage vmalloc mappings"),
it will allocate memory in current node instead of interleaving allocate
memory.

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CANn89iL6AAyWhfxdHO+jaT075iOa3XcYn9k6JJc7JR2XYn6k_Q@mail.gmail.com/

[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CANn89iLofTR=AK-QOZY87RdUZENCZUT4O6a0hvhu3_EwRMerOg@mail.gmail.com/

Fixes: 121e6f3258fe ("mm/vmalloc: hugepage vmalloc mappings")
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Wandun <chenwandun@...wei.com>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 16 ++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index d77830ff604c..87552a4018aa 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2816,6 +2816,8 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
 		unsigned int order, unsigned int nr_pages, struct page **pages)
 {
 	unsigned int nr_allocated = 0;
+	struct page *page;
+	int i;
 
 	/*
 	 * For order-0 pages we make use of bulk allocator, if
@@ -2823,7 +2825,7 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
 	 * to fails, fallback to a single page allocator that is
 	 * more permissive.
 	 */
-	if (!order) {
+	if (!order && nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) {
 		while (nr_allocated < nr_pages) {
 			unsigned int nr, nr_pages_request;
 
@@ -2848,7 +2850,7 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
 			if (nr != nr_pages_request)
 				break;
 		}
-	} else
+	} else if (order)
 		/*
 		 * Compound pages required for remap_vmalloc_page if
 		 * high-order pages.
@@ -2856,11 +2858,13 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
 		gfp |= __GFP_COMP;
 
 	/* High-order pages or fallback path if "bulk" fails. */
-	while (nr_allocated < nr_pages) {
-		struct page *page;
-		int i;
 
-		page = alloc_pages_node(nid, gfp, order);
+	page = NULL;
+	while (nr_allocated < nr_pages) {
+		if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
+			page = alloc_pages(gfp, order);
+		else
+			page = alloc_pages_node(nid, gfp, order);
 		if (unlikely(!page))
 			break;
 
-- 
2.25.1