linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] rtw89: fix return value check in rtw89_cam_send_sec_key

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Oct 2021 20:40:37 +0800
From:   Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
        <kuba@...nel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rtw89: fix return value check in
 rtw89_cam_send_sec_key_cmd()

Hi,

On 2021/10/18 20:16, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> Fix the return value check which testing the wrong variable
>> in rtw89_cam_send_sec_key_cmd().
>>
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
>> Fixes: e3ec7017f6a2 ("rtw89: add Realtek 802.11ax driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
>> Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
> rtw89 patches are applied wireless-drivers-next, not net-next. rtw89 is not
> even in net-next yet.
It should be -next.

Thanks,
Yang
>