[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <671df474-be18-4fdb-bfd6-c8cef0536d00@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 20:40:37 +0800
From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rtw89: fix return value check in
rtw89_cam_send_sec_key_cmd()
Hi,
On 2021/10/18 20:16, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> Fix the return value check which testing the wrong variable
>> in rtw89_cam_send_sec_key_cmd().
>>
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
>> Fixes: e3ec7017f6a2 ("rtw89: add Realtek 802.11ax driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
>> Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
> rtw89 patches are applied wireless-drivers-next, not net-next. rtw89 is not
> even in net-next yet.
It should be -next.
Thanks,
Yang
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists