[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB46009B2C54D32B836B73CF9BF7BD9@OSBPR01MB4600.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 04:59:52 +0000
From: "nakamura.shun@...itsu.com" <nakamura.shun@...itsu.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"irogers@...gle.com" <irogers@...gle.com>,
"linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libperf: Add processing to scale the counters
obtained during the read() system call when multiplexing
Hi Rob
Sorry for the late reply.
> > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 07:16:26PM +0900, Shunsuke Nakamura wrote:
> > > > From: nakamura shunsuke <nakamura.shun@...itsu.com>
> > > >
> > > > perf_evsel__read() scales counters obtained by RDPMC during multiplexing, but
> > > > does not scale counters obtained by read() system call.
> > > >
> > > > Add processing to perf_evsel__read() to scale the counters obtained during the
> > > > read() system call when multiplexing.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Nakamura <nakamura.shun@...itsu.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > tools/lib/perf/evsel.c | 6 ++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c b/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> > > > index 8441e3e1aaac..0ebd1d34436f 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> > > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> > > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > > > #include <sys/ioctl.h>
> > > > #include <sys/mman.h>
> > > > #include <asm/bug.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/math64.h>
> > > >
> > > > void perf_evsel__init(struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct perf_event_attr *attr,
> > > > int idx)
> > > > @@ -321,6 +322,11 @@ int perf_evsel__read(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int cpu, int thread,
> > > > if (readn(*fd, count->values, size) <= 0)
> > > > return -errno;
> > > >
> > > > + if (count->ena != count->run) {
> > > > + if (count->run != 0)
> > > > + count->val = mul_u64_u64_div64(count->val, count->ena, count->run);
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > so I think perf stat expect raw values in there and does the
> > > scaling by itself, please check following code:
> > >
> > > read_counters
> > > read_affinity_counters
> > > read_counter_cpu
> > > read_single_counter
> > > evsel__read_counter
> > >
> > > perf_stat_process_counter
> > > process_counter_maps
> > > process_counter_values
> > > perf_counts_values__scale
> > >
> > >
> > > perhaps we could export perf_counts_values__scale if it'd be any help
> >
> > Thank you for your comment.
> >
> > The purpose of this patch is to unify the counters obtained with
> > perf_evsel__read() to scaled or unscaled values.
> >
> > perf_evsel__read() gets counter by perf_mmap__read_self() if RDPMC is
> > available, else gets by readn(). In current implementation, caller
> > gets scaled counter if goes through RDPMC path, otherwise gets unscaled
> > counter via readn() path.
> >
> > However caller cannnot know which path were taken.
> >
> > If caller expects a raw value, I think the RDPMC path should also
> > return an unscaled counter.
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c b/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> > index c89dfa5..aaa4579 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> > @@ -353,8 +353,6 @@ int perf_mmap__read_self(struct perf_mmap *map, struct perf_counts_values *count
> > count->ena += delta;
> > if (idx)
> > count->run += delta;
> > -
> > - cnt = mul_u64_u64_div64(cnt, count->ena, count->run);
> > }
> >
> > count->val = cnt;
> >
> > Rob, do you have any comments?
>
> Submit a proper patch with the above.
Thank you for your comment.
I will send the v3 patch.
Best Regards
Shunsuke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists