[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211019165747.GU2744544@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:57:47 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"jean-philippe@...aro.org" <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"parav@...lanox.com" <parav@...lanox.com>,
"lkml@...ux.net" <lkml@...ux.net>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"lushenming@...wei.com" <lushenming@...wei.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com" <yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"Tian, Jun J" <jun.j.tian@...el.com>, "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"david@...son.dropbear.id.au" <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
"nicolinc@...dia.com" <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 01/20] iommu/iommufd: Add /dev/iommu core
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 09:57:34AM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 08:18:07 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 09:18:06AM +0000, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> >
> > > > Acquire from the xarray is
> > > > rcu_lock()
> > > > ioas = xa_load()
> > > > if (ioas)
> > > > if (down_read_trylock(&ioas->destroying_lock))
> > >
> > > all good suggestions, will refine accordingly. Here destroying_lock is a
> > > rw_semaphore. right? Since down_read_trylock() accepts a rwsem.
> >
> > Yes, you probably need a sleeping lock
> >
> I am not following why we want a sleeping lock inside RCU protected
> section?
trylock is not sleeping
> For ioas, do we really care about the stale data to choose rw_lock vs RCU?
> Destroying can be kfree_rcu?
It needs a hard fence so things don't continue to use the IOS once it
is destroyed.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists