[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YW8JeJ6C9SzcGaqS@matsya>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 23:37:52 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp: IPQ6018 and IPQ8074
PCIe PHY require no supply
Hi Shawn,
On 07-10-21, 14:26, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 05-10-21, 08:47, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Mon 04 Oct 23:34 PDT 2021, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >
> > > On 29-09-21, 11:42, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > > The qmp-phy driver suggests that 'vdda-phy-supply' and 'vdda-pll-supply'
> > > > are not required for IPQ6018 and IPQ8074 QMP PCIe PHY. Update the
> > > > bindings to reflect it.
> > > >
> > > > While at it, also correct the clock properies for IPQ8074 QMP PCIe PHY.
> > > > And as the result, 'qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy' and
> > > > 'qcom,ipq6018-qmp-pcie-phy' share the same clock, reset and supply
> > > > bindings.
> > >
> > > Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > >
> >
> > I think it's better if you take the two dt-bindings through your tree,
> > so we avoid any potential merge conflicts related to possible other
> > changes.
>
> Okay picked up the binding patches
This failed to apply for me, can you please rebase and send
Thanks
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists