[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YW8J8Nc7UJnISaVg@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:09:52 +0300
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/i915: Add support for panels with VESA
backlights with PWM enable/disable
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:40:14PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> This simply adds proper support for panel backlights that can be controlled
> via VESA's backlight control protocol, but which also require that we
> enable and disable the backlight via PWM instead of via the DPCD interface.
> We also enable this by default, in order to fix some people's backlights
> that were broken by not having this enabled.
>
> For reference, backlights that require this and use VESA's backlight
> interface tend to be laptops with hybrid GPUs, but this very well may
> change in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3680
> Fixes: fe7d52bccab6 ("drm/i915/dp: Don't use DPCD backlights that need PWM enable/disable")
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v5.12+
> ---
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 24 ++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> index 569d17b4d00f..594fdc7453ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> @@ -293,6 +293,10 @@ intel_dp_aux_vesa_enable_backlight(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(connector->encoder);
>
> + if (!panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info.aux_enable)
> + panel->backlight.pwm_funcs->enable(crtc_state, conn_state,
> + panel->backlight.pwm_level_max);
What't the story here with the non-inverted max vs. pontetially inverted
0 in the counterpart?
> +
> drm_edp_backlight_enable(&intel_dp->aux, &panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info, level);
> }
>
> @@ -304,6 +308,10 @@ static void intel_dp_aux_vesa_disable_backlight(const struct drm_connector_state
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(connector->encoder);
>
> drm_edp_backlight_disable(&intel_dp->aux, &panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info);
> +
> + if (!panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info.aux_enable)
> + panel->backlight.pwm_funcs->disable(old_conn_state,
> + intel_backlight_invert_pwm_level(connector, 0));
> }
>
> static int intel_dp_aux_vesa_setup_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, enum pipe pipe)
> @@ -321,6 +329,15 @@ static int intel_dp_aux_vesa_setup_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector,
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> + if (!panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info.aux_enable) {
> + ret = panel->backlight.pwm_funcs->setup(connector, pipe);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + drm_err(&i915->drm,
> + "Failed to setup PWM backlight controls for eDP backlight: %d\n",
> + ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> panel->backlight.max = panel->backlight.edp.vesa.info.max;
> panel->backlight.min = 0;
> if (current_mode == DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_CONTROL_MODE_DPCD) {
> @@ -340,12 +357,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_supports_vesa_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>
> - /* TODO: We currently only support AUX only backlight configurations, not backlights which
> - * require a mix of PWM and AUX controls to work. In the mean time, these machines typically
> - * work just fine using normal PWM controls anyway.
> - */
> - if ((intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1] & DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_AUX_ENABLE_CAP) &&
> - drm_edp_backlight_supported(intel_dp->edp_dpcd)) {
> + if (drm_edp_backlight_supported(intel_dp->edp_dpcd)) {
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "AUX Backlight Control Supported!\n");
> return true;
> }
> --
> 2.31.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists