[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211019125147.0ad010f318bbd8233cadcdae@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 12:51:47 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] memcg, kmem: further deprecate kmem.limit_in_bytes
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:34:08 -0700 Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> wrote:
> The deprecation process of kmem.limit_in_bytes started with the commit
> 0158115f702 ("memcg, kmem: deprecate kmem.limit_in_bytes") which also
> explains in detail the motivation behind the deprecation. To summarize,
> it is the unexpected behavior on hitting the kmem limit. This patch
> moves the deprecation process to the next stage by disallowing to set
> the kmem limit. In future we might just remove the kmem.limit_in_bytes
> file completely.
>
> ...
>
> @@ -3791,10 +3766,8 @@ static ssize_t mem_cgroup_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
> ret = mem_cgroup_resize_max(memcg, nr_pages, true);
> break;
> case _KMEM:
> - pr_warn_once("kmem.limit_in_bytes is deprecated and will be removed. "
> - "Please report your usecase to linux-mm@...ck.org if you "
> - "depend on this functionality.\n");
> - ret = memcg_update_kmem_max(memcg, nr_pages);
> + /* kmem.limit_in_bytes is deprecated. */
> + ret = -ENOTSUPP;
> break;
> case _TCP:
> ret = memcg_update_tcp_max(memcg, nr_pages);
checkpatch said "ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP"?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists