[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wnm9o43c.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:39:51 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, bilbao@...edu,
corbet@....net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, leon@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linuxarm@...wei.com, luzmaximilian@...il.com,
mchehab+huawei@...nel.org, schnelle@...ux.ibm.com,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] PCI/MSI: Clarify the IRQ sysfs ABI for PCI devices
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 22:50:47 +0100,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 06:26:33PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> > From: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
> >
> >
> > /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../irq has been there for many years but it has never
> > been documented. This patchset is trying to clarify it.
> >
> > -v3:
> > - Don't attempt to modify the current behaviour of IRQ ABI for MSI-X
> > - Make MSI IRQ ABI more explicit(return 1st IRQ of the IRQ vector)
> > - Add Marc's patch of removing default_irq from the previous comment to
> > the series.
> > Note patch 3/3 indirectly changed the code of pci_restore_msi_state(),
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl_pf.c is the only driver
> > calling this API. I would appreciate testing done from this driver's
> > maintainers.
> >
> > -v2:
> > - split into two patches according to Bjorn's comments;
> > - Add Greg's Acked-by, thanks for reviewing!
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210820223744.8439-1-21cnbao@gmail.com/
> >
> > -v1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210813122650.25764-1-21cnbao@gmail.com/#t
> >
> > Barry Song (2):
> > Documentation: ABI: sysfs-bus-pci: Add description for IRQ entry
> > PCI/sysfs: Don't depend on pci_dev.irq for IRQ entry
>
> I applied the first two (above) to pci/msi for v5.16, thanks!
>
> As far as I can tell from the discussion so far, they should be safe
> and should preserve all existing behavior. The second patch should
> remove the sysfs dependency on the PCI core to swap the INTx and first
> MSI IRQ values in dev->irq.
>
> Marc's patch below is certainly desirable but my understanding is that
> it requires some driver updates first.
Indeed. It means that there will be an uphill battle to remove the
INTx/MSI confusion in a lot of drivers (Barry says about 700 of them,
and I can't say I'm surprised).
We can probably tackle that as a background task for the next few
releases (I need to relearn Coccinelle for the 27th time...).
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists