[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <887de3a1ecadda3dbfe0adf9df9070f0afa9406c.1634630486.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:04:17 +0100
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 18/23] fs: remove a comment pointing to the removed mandatory-locking file
The mandatory file locking got removed due to its problems, but
there's still a comment inside fs/locks.c pointing to the removed
doc.
Remove it.
Fixes: f7e33bdbd6d1 ("fs: remove mandatory file locking support")
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
---
To mailbombing on a large number of people, only mailing lists were C/C on the cover.
See [PATCH v3 00/23] at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1634630485.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org/
fs/locks.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index d397394633be..94feadcdab4e 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -61,7 +61,6 @@
*
* Initial implementation of mandatory locks. SunOS turned out to be
* a rotten model, so I implemented the "obvious" semantics.
- * See 'Documentation/filesystems/mandatory-locking.rst' for details.
* Andy Walker (andy@...aker.kvaerner.no), April 06, 1996.
*
* Don't allow mandatory locks on mmap()'ed files. Added simple functions to
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists