[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211018220652.014c12a0@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 22:06:52 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] s390: DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALL support
On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:48:20 +0200
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 08:25:14PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 07:04:53PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > > See here:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211008091336.33616-1-jolsa@kernel.org/
> > > >
> > > > I applied Jiri's patch set and the newly added selftest passes.
> > >
> > > nice, could I have your Tested-by? ;-)
> >
> > Well, now I added also the missing pieces to ftrace-direct-multi
> > sample module and when loading that and looking into
> > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace it looks like "my_direct_func" gets
> > some random junk as parameter and nothing that could count as "ip".
> >
> > Will look into that, probably tomorrow.
>
> Ok, if I load the correct module, it even works. I had a bug in the
> first version, fixed it, but still loaded the broken module to test
> my changes. Clever me ;)
>
> So it all works for me.
BTW, in case you need my ack:
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
for the series.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists