[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YW6SqH1R7stXk2GG@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:40:56 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] x86/alternative: Implement .retpoline_sites support
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:06:35PM +0000, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 18:56:35 +0200
>
> Hi,
>
> Gave it a spin with Clang/LLVM, and
Just your normal clang build, not some fancy LTO ? eg. make CC=clang.
> > > > + target = addr + insn->length + insn->immediate.value;
> > > > + reg = (target - &__x86_indirect_thunk_rax) /
> > > > + (&__x86_indirect_thunk_rcx - &__x86_indirect_thunk_rax);
>
> this triggers
>
> > > > +
> > > > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(reg & ~0xf))
> > > > + return -1;
>
> this:
>
> WARN in patch_retpoline:408: addr pcibios_scan_specific_bus+0x196/0x200, op 0xe8, reg 0xb88ca
> WARN in patch_retpoline:408: addr xen_pv_teardown_msi_irqs+0x8d/0x120, op 0xe8, reg 0xb88ca
> WARN in patch_retpoline:408: addr __mptcp_sockopt_sync+0x7e/0x200, op 0xe8, reg 0xb88ca
> [...]
> (thousands of them, but op == 0xe8 && reg == 0xb88ca are always the same)
>
> I know this reg calculation is about to be replaced, but anyway ;)
Well, I was sorta hoping to keep that with something like:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YWgA+vbWCdGLZhq5@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Anyway, let me try and reproduce.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists