[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f352a2e4b50a8678a8ddef5177702ecf9040490f.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 06:50:21 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/23] fs: remove a comment pointing to the removed
mandatory-locking file
On Tue, 2021-10-19 at 09:04 +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The mandatory file locking got removed due to its problems, but
> there's still a comment inside fs/locks.c pointing to the removed
> doc.
>
> Remove it.
>
> Fixes: f7e33bdbd6d1 ("fs: remove mandatory file locking support")
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
> ---
>
> To mailbombing on a large number of people, only mailing lists were C/C on the cover.
> See [PATCH v3 00/23] at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1634630485.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org/
>
> fs/locks.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> index d397394633be..94feadcdab4e 100644
> --- a/fs/locks.c
> +++ b/fs/locks.c
> @@ -61,7 +61,6 @@
> *
> * Initial implementation of mandatory locks. SunOS turned out to be
> * a rotten model, so I implemented the "obvious" semantics.
> - * See 'Documentation/filesystems/mandatory-locking.rst' for details.
> * Andy Walker (andy@...aker.kvaerner.no), April 06, 1996.
> *
> * Don't allow mandatory locks on mmap()'ed files. Added simple functions to
Thanks Mauro. I'll pick this into my locks branch, so it should make
v5.16 as well.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists