linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6655: Fix line wrapping in rf.c file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YW6oHsli56urDry6@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:12:30 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@...il.com>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com,
        forest@...ttletooquiet.net, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6655: Fix line wrapping in rf.c file

On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:59:56AM +0100, Karolina Drobnik wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thank you very much for your comments.
> 
> On Mon, 2021-10-18 at 17:12 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > Also, these are all just fine as-is for now.  A better way to make
> > these lines smaller is to use better variable and function names 
> > that are shorter and make sense :)
> 
> I have v2 ready but I'm not sure, given the Joe's patch, if my solution
> is a satisfactory one. I didn't jump on such refactoring as I'm still
> learning about the codebase/process and didn't want to muddle the
> waters (...more than I do already).
> 
> Greg, what would you prefer? Should I back up with my patch, pick
> something else and let Joe's patch be merged?

Joe hasn't submitted it in a format that I can take it in, so that is up
to you, I can't tell you want to work on :)

good luck!

greg k-h