[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YW6owLxoYbxG5GxT@ninjato>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:15:12 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>,
jie.deng@...el.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: virtio: disable timeout handling
> The other side is the software that has access to the _Real_ hardware,
> and so we should trust it. So we can have a actually have a completion
> without timeout here, interesting.
So, if the other side gets a timeout talking to the HW, then the timeout
error will be propagated? If so, then we may live with plain
wait_for_completion().
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists