[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c64a5a1-128a-7448-f429-b2d195819ca2@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:30:26 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
<linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Cleanup MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
Hi Thomas, Could you pickup this cleanup patchset from your tree if
possible, thanks.
On 2021/9/29 10:35, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Most ARCHs support SPARSE_IRQ, the dynamical and statical irq
> description allocation are alternative.
>
> The last user of MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ is sh/csky, but the sh use
> SPARSE_IRQ, MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ could be kill. and for csky, it
> uses statical allocation by default.
>
> So MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ seems to be useless, no need to maintain a
> separate MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ config, kill it.
>
> Also cleanup the kernel/irq/Kconfig a little.
>
> v2:
> - drop all the NR_IRQS suggested by Geert
> - don' use SPARSE_IRQ for csky by default, suggested by Guo.
>
> Kefeng Wang (3):
> sh: Cleanup about SPARSE_IRQ
> csky: Kill MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
> genirq: Cleanup Kconfig
>
> arch/csky/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/sh/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/sh/include/asm/irq.h | 11 ---------
> kernel/irq/Kconfig | 50 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists