[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211019131234.GA221392@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:12:34 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
James Clark <James.Clark@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf arm-spe: Implement find_snapshot callback
Hi German,
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 10:23:01AM +0100, German Gomez wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> Yeah I agree the redundant AUX events are adding unnecessary bloat to
> the perf.data file... We actually cam across this when doing one of the
> test cases. Sorry for not reporting it!
No worries.
> Could we patch the driver in a separate patch set? Or do you think this
> is critical for the purposes of this one?
Yeah, we can take low priority for the redundant AUX events issue.
Please take a look for the issue mentioned in another email for
recording trace data with wrong size. I think the issue for wrong
snapshot trace size should have a fixing in Arm SPE driver, and the
fixing need to be verified with the perf patches. After that I am fine
for merging the perf patches (and you could upstream kernel driver
patches separately). How about you think?
Thanks,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists