linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] dt-bindings: net: Add schema for Qualcomm BAM-DMUX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:19:42 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
        Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@...ksander.es>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DMA GENERIC OFFLOAD ENGINE SUBSYSTEM" 
        <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Andy
        Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>," 
        <~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht>,
        Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] dt-bindings: net: Add schema for Qualcomm BAM-DMUX

On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 2:03 AM Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 03:22:25PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 04:17:35PM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > > The BAM Data Multiplexer provides access to the network data channels of
> > > modems integrated into many older Qualcomm SoCs, e.g. Qualcomm MSM8916 or
> > > MSM8974. It is built using a simple protocol layer on top of a DMA engine
> > > (Qualcomm BAM) and bidirectional interrupts to coordinate power control.
> > >
> > > The device tree node combines the incoming interrupt with the outgoing
> > > interrupts (smem-states) as well as the two DMA channels, which allows
> > > the BAM-DMUX driver to request all necessary resources.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
> > > ---
> > > Changes since RFC: None.
> > > ---
> > >  .../bindings/net/qcom,bam-dmux.yaml           | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,bam-dmux.yaml
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,bam-dmux.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,bam-dmux.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..33e125e70cb4
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,bam-dmux.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/qcom,bam-dmux.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: Qualcomm BAM Data Multiplexer
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > +  - Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
> > > +
> > > +description: |
> > > +  The BAM Data Multiplexer provides access to the network data channels
> > > +  of modems integrated into many older Qualcomm SoCs, e.g. Qualcomm MSM8916
> > > +  or MSM8974. It is built using a simple protocol layer on top of a DMA engine
> > > +  (Qualcomm BAM DMA) and bidirectional interrupts to coordinate power control.
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    const: qcom,bam-dmux
> >
> > Is this block the same on every SoC? It needs to be SoC specific.
> >
>
> Hm, I think describing it as *SoC*-specific wouldn't be accurate:
> This node does not describe any hardware block, it's more a "firmware
> convention". The only hardware involved is the BAM DMA engine, which
> already has SoC/IP-specific compatibles in its own device tree node.
>
> This means that if anything there should be "firmware version"-specific
> compatibles, because one SoC might have different (typically signed)
> firmware versions that provide slightly different functionality.
> However, I have to admit that I'm not familiar enough with the different
> firmware versions to come up with a reasonable naming schema for the
> compatible. :/
>
> In general, I cannot think of any difference between different versions
> that would matter to a driver. The protocol is quite simple, and minor
> firmware differences can be better handled through the control channel
> that sets up the connection for the modem.
>
> Does that make sense?

Okay. Please add some of the above details to the binding.

Rob