[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211019092124.6b403ca4@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:21:24 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 13/19] rtla: Add Documentation
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 14:56:15 +0200
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org> wrote:
> I am not a document format specialist, neither have a strong opinion on this, so
> suggestions are welcome. I used this format as a suggestion from steven, it is
> also similar to what we have on perf...
My suggestion came from not knowing that the man pages were going to live
in the kernel Documentation tree ;-)
>
> The idea here is to create a set of man pages. I saw that it is possible to
> create man pages using Sphinx, but there are so many options that it is hard to
> get started...
>
> I also noticed that bpftools uses .rst files, but uses rst2man to convert the files.
>
> Converting the current files to .rst is easy.
>
> So, could give me some directions on what you think would be the best way to
> create this set of man pages?
>
> A link to a project that creates a set of man pages using Sphinx using a
> Makefile would be a plus :-).
If everyone is OK with converting to .rst and using rst2man I'm fine with
that.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists