linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: virtio: disable timeout handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211019141424.2lqc5cd5adiqffur@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Tue, 19 Oct 2021 19:44:24 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>,
        jie.deng@...el.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: virtio: disable timeout handling

On 19-10-21, 13:15, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > The other side is the software that has access to the _Real_ hardware,
> > and so we should trust it. So we can have a actually have a completion
> > without timeout here, interesting.
> 
> So, if the other side gets a timeout talking to the HW, then the timeout
> error will be propagated?

It should be, ideally :)

> If so, then we may live with plain wait_for_completion().

-- 
viresh