[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YW7amQa2DviKapl8@krava>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:47:53 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] ftrace: Add multi direct modify interface
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 10:44:11AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:03:03 +0200
> Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > > You can make sure the patches in there have your latest version, as you can
> > > review my patch. I'll update the tags if you give me one.
> >
> > I'm getting error when compiling:
> >
> > CC kernel/trace/ftrace.o
> > kernel/trace/ftrace.c: In function ‘modify_ftrace_direct_multi’:
> > kernel/trace/ftrace.c:5608:2: error: label ‘out_unlock’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-label]
>
> Ah, I don't think I've been hit by the "-Werror" yet ;-)
>
>
> > 5608 | out_unlock:
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > looks like out_unlock is nolonger needed, I removed it
>
> My tests would have found this, as it has a check for "new warnings".
>
> Anyway, was this in your latest patch, or did I pull in and older one?
>
> That is, should I expect a v2 from you?
it's on top of your ftrace/core, in your change:
e62d91d8206e ftrace/direct: Do not disable when switching direct callers
just removing the label will fix it
also you can add my ack
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists