[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211019112506.2901184a@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:25:06 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 13/19] rtla: Add Documentation
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 17:08:57 +0200
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Is this really tracing, or is it another domain (analysis)?
>
> Hummm... it uses tracing and capture trace... but to do analysis. rtsl (tool
> inside the rtla in the future) will be even more in the analysis side....
Right. It's a user of tracing, but not a tracer itself. Which is why I'm
thinking it deserves its own category.
Jon, do you have thoughts about this?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists