[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8735oxt4ny.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:28:33 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 13/19] rtla: Add Documentation
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org> writes:
> On 10/19/21 15:21, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> My suggestion came from not knowing that the man pages were going to live
>> in the kernel Documentation tree ;-)
>
> That is true!
>
> Question, should we mode these files to Documentation/trace/ ?
Hmm...we don't really have man pages for individual commands now, so
haven't thought much about how to handle them.
My first reaction would be to make a new directory like
Documentation/tools and put man pages there. That can become a new
"book" within the larger documentation collection. Make sense?
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists