[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whjqWwo16jtLduxb+0nbNetp8jNAz+go01wB4HGKX=jEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:57:58 -1000
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20] signal/sh: Use force_sig(SIGKILL) instead of do_group_exit(SIGKILL)
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 7:44 AM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
> + force_sig(SIGKILL);
I wonder if SIGFPE would be a more intuitive thing.
Doesn't really matter, this is a "doesn't happen" event anyway, but
that was just my reaction to reading the patch.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists